Interesting readings on Economics Nobel Prize

The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences has decided to award The Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel for 2013 to

1. Eugene F. Fama
2. Lars Peter Hansen
3. Robert J. Shiller

Trendspotting in asset markets:
There is no way to predict the price of stocks and bonds over the next few days or weeks. But it is quite possible to foresee the broad course of these prices over longer periods, such as the next three to five years. These findings, which might seem both surprising and contradictory, were made and analyzed by this year’s Laureates, Eugene Fama, Lars Peter Hansen and Robert Shiller.

Nobel Prize winners say markets are irrational, yet efficient
Are stock markets irrational, driven by greed and fear, subject to euphoria and panic? Or are they highly efficient indicators of intrinsic value? Both, says the Nobel Prize Comittee for Economics, with no sense of contradiction.

The economics Nobel matters for India
The recent announcement of the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel has gone to three extremely deserving recipients. The combination of deep economic insight and clever methodological contributions that Eugene Fama, Lars Hansen and Robert Shiller have brought to this field has revolutionized our understanding of the determinants of asset prices.

Split Nobel prize shows bubbles are worth watching
Economics is the only field in which two people can share a Nobel prize for saying opposing things.

Economists Clash on Theory, but Will Still Share the Nobel

Nobel Prize U.S. winner warns of 'bubbly' global home prices

Fama, Shiller, Hansen Win Nobel Prize for Asset-Price Work

Can hawkish monetary policy alone, control the inflation?

Indian central bank, Reserve Bank of India is meeting on 3rd May for monetary policy meeting of 2011-12 and expected to increase interest rates by 25-50 basis points to rein the inflation. At that time RBI governor Mr. D Subbarao might wonder about the above question as he already increased the interest rates, 8 times in last one year or so. But still many analysts believe, RBI is behind the curve to curb the inflation pressure, as Inflation measured by CPI is in double digits (or near by) through out the year. A year back RBI’s comfort zone of inflation was 5.5% and now it has been revised multiple times and more recently to 8% from 7%. Because of this condition there is a talk going on about Indian economy overheating and India not able to handle the growth!

Economist, Sir John Maynard Keynes and Keynesians believed that “changes in the interest rates do not directly affect the prices and inflation is due to pressure in the economy”. They feel that supply of money is a major, but not the only, cause of inflation. They might be right or wrong in the case of other parts of the world but in Indian case it looks like they are correct. Indian inflation may be due third form of Inflation, i.e. Built inflation and neither Demand-pull inflation (increase in demand) nor Cost-push inflation (drop in supply)! In Built-in inflation, people expect higher prices for future from past experience and also supported by price/wage vicious circle.

The very basic point about inflation is, going by the definition, “its rise in the price levels of goods and services in an economy”. Considering the definition, let’s look at the causes of the inflation in Indian case.

First, inflation can be due to erosion in the buying power of the trading medium, i.e. country’s currency. The best example is recent hyperinflation of Zimbabwe where-in, 1 million Zimbabwean Dollar was equal to 1 American Dollar! But Indian rupee, in last two-three years traded against the major currency, i.e. Dollar in a band of Rs. 44 to Rs. 48 per Dollar. So there is not much scope for this argument.

Second, the Cost-push inflation due to sudden drop in the supply side of the economy. In a globalised world, supply side shocks may not lasts too long, particularly not two years and so (as Indian Inflation is in double digits for almost two years). Take recent example of Onion price, due to shortage, prices doubled and even tripled for a month or so, but once the supply resumed, prices cooled off. The same logic applies to Oil prices also whose price spiked due to Middle East crisis and hopes of recovery. If Oil price spike is only because Middle East crisis and not due to recovery, then it’s very difficult to sustain at this level!

Third, Demand-pull inflation due to rise in the demand because of higher expendable income helped by higher income and supported by higher spending by private and government. According to one school of thought, “Demand inflation is constructive to a faster rate of economic growth since along with favorable market conditions, it will stimulate investments and expansions”. They say, higher growth comes with higher inflation and we need to learn to live with that, if we want higher growth.

The Demand-pull inflation along with Built-in inflation is the most feasible reason for the Indian inflation from above mentioned three types of causes. Digging even further tells us that inflation is a part of the broad economical cycle and very structural in nature. So to curb this kind of inflation, there should be combined efforts from RBI (in monetary front), Governments (in reducing fiscal/current a/c deficit by reducing spending), lesser Borrowed inflation (from across the border in terms of imports), people’s mentality and so on. Finally we must remember nothing is decoupled in an open economy!

India needs purchasing power rather than subsidies

Recently Tamil Nadu faced state elections and both the main parties were talking about 1 kilo rice for Rs. 1 and other subsidized food products. I have taken Tamil Nadu's example because of recent elections, otherwise subsidies are abundant everywhere in India.

What I wonder is, governments fix the minimum support price for the food article to support the farmers, buys it from the farmers for the support price and same governments sell them to its citizens in a subsidized prices like of Rs. 1. Its same for the oil and its by-products also. So who is going to take care of the deficit of these transactions and how long is it going to work on just blame-game?

India faced a severe Balance of Payment (BOP) crisis in 1991 due to higher fiscal deficit and some external shocks like oil crisis and wars. At that time India had forex reserve of 1 billion dollars which was sufficient to import for just one week. Since oil and wars were/are not in our control totally, no point to elaborate on those issues. But what Indian central and state governments could have controlled is the deficit problem. Due to socialistic era and combined with populist budgets like above mentioned ones (particularly started in southern and eastern states) caused irreversible deficit to the exchequer. And surprising fact is still we are following the same old route towards a possible BOP crisis even after seeing other countries taking development mantras.

Now, in this LPG (Liberalized, Privatized and Globalized) era, India's much publicized recent problems are PDS (Public Distribution System) and Inflation. Due to subsidies, majority of the PDS quantity is sold in the black market without letting the targeted person to claim it.

To avoid the PDS problem central government has started an ambitious project called Unique Identification Number (also called as Adhar) under the leadership of Mr. Nandan Nilekani. But the fundamental problem of "deficit" remains the same even after UID or Adhar project.

India aspires to overtake the China, over a period of next 25-30 years, but with the kind of policies is it possible? India's debt to GDP is more than 70% where-as China's is about 20%. India's foreign reserve is about 300 billion dollars where-as China's is more than 3 trillion dollars. According to recent IMF data available, China's GDP at PPP (Purchasing Power Parity) per capita is more than 35,000 dollars per year where-as India's is around 3,300, thats almost one tenth of China!

Governments should really think of improving the PPP- instead of subsidies. And PPP can be improved only if everybody gets regular jobs to contribute towards the GDP. Again jobs require education, different skill sets and more, which in turn can generate jobs. Governments should think about taking up projects like converting Narrow Gauge to Meter to Broad and single line to double to four line railway tracks, not just increase the trains. Why I am mentioning railway project is because projects like National Highway (by Vajpayee government) and railway track doubling are through out India and can generate lot of employment and at the same time can improve the infrastructure of the country.

Indian Economy Overheating

Yesterday, 11th April, 2011 IMF came up with a report, stating emerging economies, particularly Brazil, India, China and sub-Saharan African countries are overheating.

On January 23rd, I posted in my blog about the Indian economy overheating due constant inflation from two years or so.

On 26th January mint published an article on similar topic of overheating of Indian economy due to Inflation pressure.

Today, 12th April 2011, mint has a front page article stating "IMF signals overheating of economy"

See the comparison...

Excerpts from yesterday's IMF report...

The global economic recovery is gaining strength, with world growth projected at about 4½ percent in both 2011 and 2012, but unemployment remains high, and risks of overheating are building in emerging market economies, the IMF said in its latest forecast.

“Fears have turned to commodity prices,” said Olivier Blanchard, Chief Economist at the IMF. “Commodity prices have increased more than expected, reflecting a combination of strong demand growth and a number of supply shocks. These increases conjure the specter of 1970s-style stagflation, but they appear unlikely to derail the recovery,” he told a press conference in Washington.

In many emerging market economies, demand is robust and overheating is a growing policy concern. Developing economies, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa, have also resumed fast and sustainable growth. But the IMF said new risks have emerged.

Rising food and commodity prices pose a threat to poor households, adding to social and economic tensions, notably in the Middle East and North Africa.

The challenge for many emerging and some developing economies is to ensure that present boom-like conditions do not develop into overheating over the coming year. Inflation pressure is likely to build further as growing production comes up against capacity constraints, with large food and energy price increases raising pressure for higher wages.

For full statement click here.

Excerpts from Today's mint headlines...

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) cautioned on Monday that emerging markets such as India are exhibiting signs of overheating, which if not immediately addressed could result in a sharp reversal in the growth momentum.

Overheating of the economy happens when the productive capacity is not able to keep pace with aggregate demand. IMF is, therefore, regardless of the impact on economic growth, making a case for steeper rate hikes by central banks to contain demand and thereby curb inflationary pressures.

HDFC Bank chief economist Abheek Barua said there are “severe signs of overheating” in the economy. “We need to move to permanent slower growth for some time,” he said.

“Signs of overheating are starting to materialize in a number of economies. Continued high growth has meant that some economies in the region are now operating at or above potential. Credit growth is accelerating in some economies (Hong Kong, India, Indonesia), and it remains high in China,” IMF said.

For full mint article, click here.

Excerpts from my 23rd January post...

Many people might be wondering why I am talking about overheating of an economy in the midst of recovery from present financial crisis. Particularly many people may not agree with the Indian Economy overheating concept that too when November IIP numbers are below 3% (2.7% to be exact), Stock market corrected almost 10% in last two months compared to its peers which gained 5%-10% at the same time and etc..

But if you see the inflation number what India is facing from last two years is above RBI's comfort zone of 5% to 6%. For the year 2009 Indian Consumer Price Index was of 8.3% averaged and where as 2010 CPI was 10.9%. Where as from 2003 to 2008 Indian consumer price index moved between 3% to 6% on average basis. So in these last two years Indian inflation went up by 4% points in the consumer price index level. In this inflation CPI or WPI, food inflation has been major contributor towards the both indexes.

I feel India is facing wage inflation, it is condition where in higher wages or increased wages chase little goods available in the market and causing increase in the prices of the goods and in turn putting pressure on wages to hike. Its like a spiraling or vicious circle.

For full blog post, click here.

Excerpts from 26th January mint article...

With high-inflation expectations and an unceasing march of prices, India is close to a wage-price spiral.

Since the new year began, the Indian stock market has fallen 8% below its December peak of 20,509 points. Long bond yields have risen by more than 20 basis points, touching 8.2%. Foreign investors have reduced their weights on Indian investments and capital inflows have turned into a trickle.

There are other reasons, too, for further monetary action. While 36% (3.1 percentage points) of the 8.4% year-on-year rise in the Wholesale Price Index (WPI) in December resulted from food prices, manufacturing inflation accounted for 34% (2.9 percentage points). The persistence in food price inflation, however—a 13.5% increase over December 2009—is now prompting doubters to suspect that strong demand factors could be at play.

Unsurprisingly, inflation expectations look set to be entrenched at higher levels, only a step short of triggering a price-wage spiral.

For article, click here.

POST-crisis, PRE-recovery dilemma

The great recession 2007-08 is history now and world is in the brink of recovery (different opinions about shape of recovery) with different pace in different places. Now almost all central bankers (both developed and developing countries) are worried about the future course of monetary actions.

Developed countries like US, UK, European Union and Japan have maintained their respective interest rate at very low levels almost equal to zero to avoid the depression. Since economy is now trying to recover from the crisis, these above mentioned country's central bankers are facing their own issues and are in dilemma whether to reverse the monetary stimulus or to go ahead with the present status for some more time?

US is getting mixed data from its economy as it Job data, and inflation data are on the positive side where as housing data is still under the pressure. UK is under the threat of Inflation and Japan is bombarded by Tsunami, nuclear crisis and 2 lost decades. European union is in dilemma as its different constituents are in very widely diverged due to countries like Germany and Ireland (or Greece) are like south and north poles in all aspects of economy.

Coming to developing countries like BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India and China) are clearly under the tremendous inflation pressure. India and China's central bankers increased their respective interest rates almost on an average once in a two month (from more than a year) to control the inflation. Brazil is under the threat of "hot money" flow due to interest rate parity and threating its currency competency. Russians are facing bubble kind of formation in almost all asset class due to rapid increase in their valuation.

Now the big question for all the central bankers is what next?

Yesterday, Tuesday, April 5th 2011 PBOC (People's Bank of China) has increased the lending and deposit rates by 25 basis points to from 6.06% to 6.31% and 3.0% to 3.25% respectively to curb the inflation. According to last available data China's CPI data for the month of February was 4.9% which is almost 1% higher than the PBOC's comfort (target) zone. But the problem PBOC might face in coming days is slower growth as it has forecast a lower GDP for coming years. Remember China spent massive amount (more than 4 trillion yuan) during the crisis times and its banks lent more than double the government spending/stimulus. So the base effect along with reverse the stimulus effect and lesser(than earlier) advantage of currency competence (due to international pressure to yuan pegging) may cause hindrance to Chinese.

Indian central banker, RBI (Reserve Bank of India) has already raised repo rate 8 times (200 basis points) from last one year and still it is indicating the targeting of the inflation. According to latest available data, WPI for February is 8.3% which above 8%, a revised target of RBI (RBI revised its inflation target from 7% to 8%). And RBI hinting to increase the interest rate in first week of May, 2011 when RBI is scheduled to meet. But in the process of inflation target RBI might loose out on GDP growth which has already shown some deceleration in IIP data and also due higher oil imports and high commodity prices cutting the margins of corporate houses and etc.

Tomorrow, April 7th 2011 ECB (European Central Bank) is meeting and many analysts are expecting ECB to increase the interest rates to target the inflation. ECB might be worried about the December inflation of 2.2% which above its target of 2%, but what about Greece, Ireland and other debt ridden Euro zone countries growth! Will it start the process for other developed countries to follow?

MPC (Monetary Policy Committee) of Bank of England is in traction to take the first step to increase the interest rates from 0.5% to 0.75% to target the inflation, but question of the hour is when? According to latest available inflation data for February is increased to 4.4% (from 4%) above the Bank of England's comfort zone of 2%. So will it bite the bullet?

Now there is lot discussion is happening around the FED's possible about QE2 (Quantitative Easing 2), FED rate, Inflation (is 2.1% and FED's target is 2%). FED might be worried about its history of 1936-37 of recession after great depression in 1930. (In the course of 10 months between 1936-1937, FED doubled its interest rates by causing recession!). It also might be wondering about the consequences of premature stimulus exit.

Bottom line:
In almost all the cases of central bankers, everybody is targeting inflation and inflation, mainly increased due to spike in oil prices, high commodity price and higher primary food articles. And inflation in most of the cases is supply side issue also instead of just increase demand! Whether mere increase in interest rates (further more in the case of developing countries) will curb the inflation immediately, without derailing the growth prospects? Global economy may not be ready to face another credit crunch! At the same time, artificial asset boosting by keeping near zero interest rates is also not good for the longer term economy, as fast history is in front us!

Mint Article:The decade in banking

Last week I read an article in mint, so thought of sharing some interesting facts... Click here for full article...

• The Indian banking system could remain insulated from the global credit crunch and its impact in the wake of the fall of US investment bank Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. on the strength of its high capital-to-assets ratio and low bad assets.
• The collective net profit of the industry was Rs7,100 crore in 2001. By 2010, it had risen eight times to Rs57,109 crore.
• Bad assets, as a percentage of loans, were 6.83% in 2001. This has come down to 1%.
• The net worth of the industry—capital plus reserves—during this period has risen from Rs57,146 crore to Rs3.56 trillion.
• The ratio of operating cost to total assets has come down from 2.68% to 1.87% and return on assets rose from 0.57% to 1.05% between 2001 and 2010, highlighting the industry’s efficiency.
• In 1991, the year India moved ahead with a process that it had begun in the mid-1980s and embraced economic liberalization, the loan outstanding in the industry was Rs1.24 trillion, about 24% of the nation’s gross domestic product (GDP). By 2000, it rose to Rs4.6 trillion, but as a percentage of GDP still remained about 25.75%. In the last decade, the loan book grew to Rs32.4 trillion, a little over 55% of India’s GDP.
• The overall number of branches has gone up from 61,724 in 1991 to 67,061 in 2000 and 81,802 in 2009 (the latest data available), but the average population serviced by one bank branch has dropped only marginally, from 15,000 in 1991 to 14,000 currently.
• In 1991, there were 35,134 rural branches, accounting for close to 57% of the total national branch network. In 2000, this number dropped to 32,673 and 48.7% of the branch network. By 2009, it dropped further to 31,549 and 38.6%. During this time, branches in metros rose from 6,191 to 8,957, and finally, to 14,761 (from 10% to 13.4% to 18%).
• In 1991, there were a little over 100 million deposit accounts in rural India— 31% of the total. By 2000, their number rose to about 126 million, but the market share slipped marginally to 30%. In 2009, the number rose to about 199 million, but as a percentage of total number of accounts, it remained the same—30%—as the overall number of deposit accounts rose from 355 million in 1991 to 662 million in 2009. The share of metros (in terms of accounts), however, rose from 19% in 1991 to 20% in 2000 and 23% in 2009.
• In 1991, there were about 32 million loan accounts in rural India—52% of total accounts. By 2000, this dropped to 25 million and 46%. In 2009, the number rose to 34 million, but as a percentage of total number of accounts it slipped further to 31%. In these two decades, the share of metros rose from 6% to 33%. In terms of money raised through these accounts, rural India’s share slipped from 21% in 1991 to 13% in 2000 and 11% in 2009, while share of metros rose from 40% to 56% and 60%, respectively.

Is Euro following fate of Bretton Wood’s Gold standard!

Before going to Euro, I would like to touch upon the Bretton Wood’s Gold Standard for the benefit of my readers. Bretton Wood’s gold standard came to existence from a war (2^nd world war) and ironically dissolved with a war (Vietnam War). After 2^nd world war, to build the International economic stabilization, certain countries came together to form a monetary system for trading, exchanging mutually tradable currency and etc. The main designers of this system were Briton’s Sir John Maynard Keynes and America’s Harry White. Even though Keynes had an Idea of new reserve currency called “Bancor” but that idea has been rejected by White and others, indicating people moving towards US rather than UK! So countries which came together, agreed to peg their currency to US dollar and US dollar in turn will be pegged to Gold, $35/Ounce and formed the organization called IMF (International Monetary Fund). The entire system was based on some condition for member countries like subscription quota for membership, trade deficit maintenance like balance payment issues and etc. But after some time due to macro economical cycles, certain changes in the world economy like, recovery of Europe, Cold War between US & USSR, globalization of banking/currency system, fast emergence of Japan, Vietnam War and balance of payment issue with US made the cracks in the gold system, making it to fall out in 1971, by then US president Nixon unilaterally withdrawing the pegging the Dollar to Gold. Which is popularly know as Nixon Shock!

Now coming to Euro, it came to existence in 1992 for most of the European Union countries as the member. The Euro formation was on some conditions like such as a 1. Annual government deficit: The ratio government deficit to GDP must not exceed 3%
and Government debt: The ratio of gross government debt to GDP must not exceed 60%.
2. Inflation rate: Not more than 1.5% higher than the average of the three best performing (lowest inflation) member states of the EU.
3. The interest rate must not be more than 2% higher than in the 3 lowest inflation member states.
4. Exchange rate: countries should have joined the exchange-rate mechanism (ERM II) under the European Monetary System (EMS) for 2 consecutive years and should not have devalued its currency during the period

But at present some of the European countries don’t look to fit any of the above conditions except currency condition for example…

Country	Government Deficit to GDP forecast	Government Debt to GDP	Inflation and Interest Rate
Ireland	10%	120%	0.6% & 1%
Greece	7%	140%	5% & 1%
Italy	4.5%	120%	1.8% & 1%
Belgium	5%	100%	3% & 1%
Spain	7%	65%	2.5% & 1%
Portugal	5%	85%	2.5% & 1%

From the above table we can say all troubled European countries like Ireland, Greece, Spain, Portugal, Italy and Belgium are

àFacing government deficit to GDP is more than 3%, which is the minimum requirement condition for EURO/EU.
à Government debt to GDP required condition is less than 60%, but each country’s debt to GDP easily exceeding the prerequisite condition. And also from country perspective Debt to GDP ratios of 120% (Ireland) and 140% (Greece) are not good. We have present example of Japan’s Balance Sheet problem due to which it lost two decades of growth and witnessed lost decade.
àNow coming to Inflation and Interest rate, see the real interest rate of each country. As ECB decides the Interest rate of the region, countries with different inflation (particularly too high and too low) will be under tremendous pressure. This might push them currency devaluation/revaluation which is again restraint condition

--- will be continued...

Today's Mint Column On Similar Note of My Last Post About Indian Economy Overheating

A losing bout with inflation

With high-inflation expectations and an unceasing march of prices, India is close to a wage-price spiral

Since the new year began, the Indian stock market has fallen 8% below its December peak of 20,509 points. Long bond yields have risen by more than 20 basis points, touching 8.2%. Foreign investors have reduced their weights on Indian investments and capital inflows have turned into a trickle.

Effectively, India stands derated. The persistence of inflation is triggering the rethink. As the feeling that policymakers have no control over inflation gathers force, their macroeconomic stewardship is under question: It didn’t help when the government indicated that usual regulatory measures were ineffective in containing inflation, expressing its helplessness. For these reasons alone, the central bank has to now raise its hand and say “I can”.

There are other reasons, too, for further monetary action. While 36% (3.1 percentage points) of the 8.4% year-on-year rise in the Wholesale Price Index (WPI) in December resulted from food prices, manufacturing inflation accounted for 34% (2.9 percentage points). The persistence in food price inflation, however—a 13.5% increase over December 2009—is now prompting doubters to suspect that strong demand factors could be at play: The prices of vegetables, fruits and other food items are flexible and what if rapid economic growth is also pushing up prices? After all, this year has been nowhere like 2009 when the worst drought in three decades caused temporary supply disruptions. Price spikes due to some vegetable crops harmed by excessive rainfall—which is the case in the last two months of 2010—are temporary and should not be reflected in higher prices of other food items.

Ahead, accelerating commodity prices abroad are a serious risk to core inflation. Some domestic prices—auto and consumer durables— have already risen, following higher input prices; other final prices are likely to follow as margin pressures build up. There’s little spare capacity as utilization levels reached 98% in October, according to a National Council of Applied Economic Research survey. The momentum in bank credit growth indicates strengthening economic activity; the annualized, three-month moving average (deseasonalized) almost doubled to 30.9% between October and December 2010 while year-on-year growth averaged 23% in the same period. Though deposit rates have picked up—deposits grew at 19% year-on-year in December—savers are still getting little returns in real terms. The money multiplier shrank further to 4.8%. The action, therefore, remains in gold and real estate: Bloomberg reported recently that gold imports into India rose to a record high in 2010 and property prices escalated beyond pre-2007 levels in some places.

Public spending continues to be expansionary and it’s unrealistic to expect cuts, given the pattern this year. Even though the fiscal deficit target will be met this year, the inflated nominal gross domestic product (GDP) and tax revenue targets do not fool anybody, nor do the contributions made by one-time, non-tax revenues. The pity is that some of this could have been diverted towards productive investments in agriculture to signal strong determination to tackle food prices; just a beginning— however small—to address the infrastructure deficit and market imperfections in the farm-to-fork supply chain. Such action would be far more credible and effective in quelling inflation expectations instead of periodic assertions that prices will cool in a couple of months. What we have instead is further stimulation through a 17-30% wage hike through indexation of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme wages to the Consumer Price Index for agricultural labourers.

Unsurprisingly, inflation expectations look set to be entrenched at higher levels, only a step short of triggering a price-wage spiral. The central bank’s own survey for July-September 2010 showed household inflation expectations to rise further—from the current perceived 12.1%—to 12.3% in the next one quarter (Oct-Dec 2010) and to 12.7% one year ahead. Though the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) raised interest rates five times, and cash reserve requirements twice in 2010, nominal GDP grew at 19.5% and 18% in the first two quarters of 2010-11, rendering the policy rate at 6.25%—too low a floor. And real interest rates—the difference between the 10-year bond yield and WPI inflation—again turned negative in December.

It is no surprise that RBI has already signalled an increase in interest rates, asserting its determination to restrain inflation. The rise—largely expected to be 25 basis points—will be accompanied by an upward revision to the central bank’s end-year forecast of 6.0% (6.5 or 7.0%?). Recent comments by RBI governor D. Subbarao that the central bank is desperate to control inflation make one doubt that the hike may be even 50 basis points though the declining momentum in industrial production may offset this. Even so, the average 8.9% GDP growth in the first half of 2010-11 may prompt RBI to revise its growth projections as well.

Later, RBI will also have to take the blame for slowing growth. But then, central banks are always the whipping boys for others.

Is Indian Economy Overheating?

Many people might be wondering why I am talking about overheating of an economy in the midst of recovery from present financial crisis. Particularly many people may not agree with the Indian Economy overheating concept that too when November IIP numbers are below 3% (2.7% to be exact), Stock market corrected almost 10% in last two months compared to its peers which gained 5%-10% at the same time and etc...

But if you see the inflation number what India is facing from last two years is above RBI's comfort zone of 5% to 6%. For the year 2009 Indian Consumer Price Index was of 8.3% averaged and where as 2010 CPI was 10.9%. Where as from 2003 to 2008 Indian consumer price index moved between 3% to 6% on average basis. So in these last two years Indian inflation went up by 4% points in the consumer price index level. In this inflation CPI or WPI, food inflation has been major contributor towards the both indexes.

Many analysts say Inflation is the problem of supply side constraint not demand side. And their point is supply side constraint is because of the structural issues we have in India (apart from abnormal rain inside India and outside of India). But what my point is "all these structural issues were in India from last 50 odd years or so, but we never faced such a consistently long inflation particularly on food side!". Now I feel we as a country might be growing much faster than we ourselves can't handle the growth!

I feel India is facing wage inflation, it is condition where in higher wages or increased wages chase little goods available in the market and causing increase in the prices of the goods and in turn putting pressure on wages to hike. Its like a spiraling or vicious circle. Here I would like to mention just one example of this wage inflation putting pressure on food or overall inflation. When I was posting about Decoupling theory, I mentioned about National Rural Employment Guaranty Scheme (NREGS), which government announced in 2005 and implemented fully in the midst of financial crisis. Under this scheme rural households are guaranteed for 100 days work in a year with the minimum 100 rupees wage per day. This has been the biggest contributor to the rural income and expendable amount in rural hand considering more than half of the Indian population is in rural areas. And most of the NRGS' works are related to infrastructure works, which is causing a real shortage of people in the agricultural fields, which in turn causing increase in the wages of the people who are ready to come for agricultural related.

So all this is leading to more spending from rural India, causing increase in the overall demand side also! Otherwise all these years whole India was divided into two parts like Demanding-Urban and Supplying-Rural. First part, that is urban (demanding side) is same or we can say it increased more, but more importantly rural (supply side) is also facing a demand pressure making it (inflation) look like a supply side constraint! That does not mean that we don't have supply side constraint, we do have supply side constraints, structural issues to reform for longer term solution and etc.

But are we ready to face the current situation and upcoming situations???

Decoupling theory depends on structural issues

Whenever world is in economical crisis or in boom period, a school thought start talking about decoupling of certain regions or countries from rest of the world saying that particular region is well protected due to certain reasons.

Many times in my previous postings I talked about the cent percent decoupling in present globalized is not possible. But to a certain extent a region or a country can be decoupled from the rest of the world only on its own structural issues.

Starting from present financial crisis we can take lot of examples where certain parts of the world are in crisis and other parts are not or not affectedly as badly as those. Now so called developed countries like US, UK, Japan, and majority part of Euro Zone are in the threat of double dip recession of deflation, where as BRIC (Brazil, Russia, China & India) countries, Australia and certain African countries are facing threat of Inflation or we can say they are reaching their previous growth trajectory.

India is on the high growth trajectory due to structural issues like domestic savings' pattern (which is of 33% to 35% compared with 2% of US), consumption oriented economy (60% of total country's GDP consumed within India), demographics (55% to 60% of the population is under the age of 26 years), cost effective nature of the companies (which applies to China also), fiscal schemes like NREGS adopted by central government during the slowdown (rather than just monetary policies or so called quantitative easing which have limitation of after certain level like liquidity trap or leakage of money supply due to Interst Rate Parity). Now talking about Inflation which presently is the biggest threat to India's real GDP growth, again due to structural issues like: sudden increase in expendable income of rural household due to NREGS scheme, non-efficiency of public distribution system (PDS) along with supply side problem due to uneven rainfall in certain parts of the country and as usual growth comes with some inflation. According to yesterday's mint, IMF advised India to keep on hiking the interest to cool the inflation, an example of decoupling compared with problem facing countries'.

Now coming to China, the second fastest growing economy, as everybody knows its an export oriented country, but if it is only dependent on export oriented then it should have been in the same position that of US. But its not, in fact it is clicking double digit growth, due to:
1. Massive stimulus package of 4 trillion Yuan, they got from Chinese government of which they spent more than 80 percent, (i.e. more than 3 trillion Yuan on overall infrastructure, which is stepping stone for a country)
2. More than 9 trillion Yuan (more than double of government stimulus) loan disbursement of Chinese banks towards their countrymen lead to massive spending from Chinese towards their internal consumption.
3. Solid current account surplus of whopping $2.6 trillion due to continuous intervention in the forex market to keep Yuan undervalued to help the exporters.

And from inflation point of view, China is also facing similar kind of situation as that of India. Chinese real interest are deep in red due to as low as almost 2% deposit rate and about 5% inflation, which is again divergence from US, UK and Japan.

So similar respective things helped different countries domestically keep the growth momentum

--- Will be continued...

Ultra low interest rates in certain regions may cause global imbalance

To avoid present financial crisis developed countries like US, Japan, UK and European Countries are keeping ultra low interest rates [0.1% of Japan, 0.25% of US, 0.5% of UK and 0.25% of ECB (deposit) ] and more over governments & central banks of these countries flooding the their respective economies with lot of Quantitative Easing (QE) by printing more money as that is the last resort in monetary policy to boost the economy.

Countries opt for QE which are facing the problem of low inflation or threat of deflation and they might have already substantially lowered the interest rate nearer to Zero. So to boost the money supply in the economy central banks are compelled to print more money and purchase government bonds from different financial institutes like banks and NBFC (Non Banking Financial Services), in turn flooding these financial institutes with lot of cheap money.

Most of the economist and policy makers provide Keynes theory of "General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money" basis for their move towards monetary easing and QE.

But Sir John Maynard Keynes proposed this theory in 1930s then world was not so globalized as it is today and world was facing double dip recession or popularly known as The Great Depression mainly due to some bad moves like liquidity tightening by FED and protectionism by global leaders.

Where as now world is more globalized than ever and we are era of "BUTTERFLY EFFECT" of Chaos theory. No country is no longer 100 percent closed economy, so no country can say it is totally delinked from rest of the world. Ultra low interest rates in these countries and QE is flooding their banks with cheap money. And this cheap money is leaking to emerging markets. This "HOT MONEY" is creating its ripple effects in commodity market, emerging country's stock markets and their macro economy.

Commodities like Copper, Silver are trading at their peaks in last 2-3 decades and Gold is trading at all time high.

And hot money from these countries is flowing to emerging markets like there is no tomorrow. For example Indian markets witnessed highest ever inflow of FIIs in September month in last 17 years, from the day FIIs allowed. More than 5 billion dollar hot money flooded in Indian markets boosting Indian markets 13% rise in September. Srilankan stock exchange "Colombo Stock Exchange" has given more than 100% return in one year from sub 7000 levels to 16000 odd levels.

Brazilian currency "Real" is appreciated a whopping 30% from March 2009. Indian currency appreciated almost 7% in last 6 months and currency appreciation is common problem to all emerging markets. Already US-China currency war is on and Brazil is shouting at its full strength.

Due to this their respective central banks will (or would have already started) intervene in forex markets by selling their own currencies leaving their local banks with lot of liquidity. This liquidity is in turn creating a pressure on inflation which is already high in certain countries like China and India.

Ultimately its a "ZERO SUM GAME". In past also lower interest rates in initial parts of 2000 (to avoid ill effects of dot com bubble burst) lead to asset bubble in US which caused present crisis.