Raghuram Rajan’s first step towards “Walk the talk”

Reserve bank of India governor Raghuram Rajan surprised financial markets on Friday in his first monetary policy review by increasing repo rate. Repo rate is interest rate at which RBI lends to banks.

Financial markets took knock as they weren't prepared for rate hike since economy is growing at slowest pace in recent time, manufacturing/industrial production is almost at standstill and some parts of interest rates were already jacked up to defend the Rupee.

But defying expectations, he decided to,

1) Increase repo rate by 25 basis points from 7.25% to 7.5%

2) Reduce the marginal standing facility (MSF) rate by 75 basis points from 10.25% to 9.5%

3) Reduce the minimum daily maintenance of the cash reserve ratio (CRR) from 99% of the requirement to 95%

On his first day as the Governor of Reserve Bank of India Raghuram Rajan said, “The Governorship of the Central Bank is not meant to win one votes or Facebook “likes”. But I hope to do the right thing, no matter what the criticism, even while looking to learn from the criticism. Some of the actions I take will not be popular.” Guess he was giving signal to markets that he is not here to please, but do the right thing!

By taking these steps he

1) Set his priority of “anchoring inflation and inflation expectations”. He thinks in the absence of an appropriate policy response, WPI inflation will be higher than initially projected and CPI inflation is worrisome. He wants to be ahead of the curve to achieve his target instead chasing it after it goes beyond control. But that doesn't mean he will sacrifice growth to have disinflationary pressure. He believes low and stable inflation in turn boost savings and investor confidence in the economy. He said in concluding remark, “the Reserve Bank will closely and continuously monitor the evolving growth-inflation dynamics with a readiness to act pre-emptively, as necessary”. Here we should remember his first day’s “A central bank should never say “Never”!” remark.

2) & 3) Is reversing some of the steps, which RBI had taken to fight the Rupee depreciation and volatility. These will take care of liquidity pressure in the banking system, additional cost of funding and send out the message loud and clear that normalizing monetary policy operation. Going ahead once the reverse repo-repo-MSF corridor come to normalcy (100 basis points difference between each), repo rate will resume the operational policy rate role.

After watching his media address (following policy review) and listening to teleconference with researchers and analysts, one thing he made sure that he is here for change. Same thing he conveyed on the 4^th September, “It involves considerable change, and change is risky. But as India develops, not changing is even riskier.”

Repeatedly he clarified things like Urjit Patel and team working on an inflation model to target instead of either plain WPI or CPI. Unusual but unique, Rajan is trying to do the balancing act between inflation anchoring, easing liquidity measures and bringing back the normal monetary operation procedure.

Now there are pitfalls in his walk. Being election year will finance minister allow him to take his own decisions and if yes how long? Rajan needs to take Chidambaram and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh into confidence. How long will he be able resist the temptation of growth friendly policy than targeting inflation? Will he able to balance between 3 legs of the impossible trinity in worst case? Will he be transparent in communicating policy guidance, without surprising too many times?  

Bond markets dictate Fed policy!

U.S. Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke in his press conference after FOMC meeting on September 18 said “we can't let market expectations dictate our policy actions”, when asked about Fed tapering. But Federal Reserve did exactly let bond markets to dictate or reverse their policy guidance communication.

From last 4 months Fed wanted to prepare markets for the reduction in bond buying program. Various governors irrespective of their dovish or hawkish stance, they talked about either for or against tapering of bond buying. They communicated and convinced markets that Fed is expected to announce tapering of the bond buying in September meeting by $10 billion as per overall consensus in the markets.

When Fed started talking about tapering Benchmark bond yield started soaring and reached peak of 2.9% recently. Before tapering news hit the markets, Benchmark 10 year bond yields were around 1.6% in early May of this year. They jumped 130 basis points as heavy sell off in treasuries incurred. 30 year U.S. mortgage rates jumped to 4.2% from 2.8% around 50% jump! Markets started filtering in the news of Fed tapering.

After yesterday's FOMC meeting, in its press release, Fed said, “The Committee sees the downside risks to the outlook for the economy and the labor market as having diminished, on net, since last fall, but the tightening of financial conditions observed in recent months, if sustained, could slow the pace of improvement in the economy and labor market.” In last 4 FOMC statements, Fed used almost same language “the committee sees the downside risk to the outlook of the economy”. Where as in this meeting it talked about concerns over financial tightening conditions in recent months!

In fact recent surge in bond yields is caused by Bernanke and his colleagues’ talk of tapering. They communicated their policy guidance as usually all central banks try to maintain the transparency in their policy guidance communication and their thought process.

Actually short term money markets eased in this span of 4-5 months. Below is the table in which all indicators indicate short term borrowing rates eased in all category.

Money market indicator	May 1, 2013	September 17, 2013	Change
2 week repo	0.17%	0.08%	-52%
3 month repo	0.16%	0.08%	-50%
2 week mortgage repo	0.21%	0.10%	-52%
3 month mortgage repo	0.20%	0.13%	-35%
Fed fund rate	0.15%	0.09%	-40%

Here question is not about whether economy started recovering or started creating enough jobs; it’s about how the world’s biggest central bank failed in judging economic scenario and failed in their communication. Many referred it as “surprise”, I would like to call it call as shocking. Surprises can be like Paul Volcker doubling Fed fund rates from 10% to 20% between 1979 and 1981 to tame the inflation. But not this one, where Fed prepared the markets for tapering and in turn markets convinced Fed not to taper!