Can hawkish monetary policy alone, control the inflation?

Indian central bank, Reserve Bank of India is meeting on 3rd May for monetary policy meeting of 2011-12 and expected to increase interest rates by 25-50 basis points to rein the inflation. At that time RBI governor Mr. D Subbarao might wonder about the above question as he already increased the interest rates, 8 times in last one year or so. But still many analysts believe, RBI is behind the curve to curb the inflation pressure, as Inflation measured by CPI is in double digits (or near by) through out the year. A year back RBI’s comfort zone of inflation was 5.5% and now it has been revised multiple times and more recently to 8% from 7%. Because of this condition there is a talk going on about Indian economy overheating and India not able to handle the growth!

Economist, Sir John Maynard Keynes and Keynesians believed that “changes in the interest rates do not directly affect the prices and inflation is due to pressure in the economy”. They feel that supply of money is a major, but not the only, cause of inflation. They might be right or wrong in the case of other parts of the world but in Indian case it looks like they are correct. Indian inflation may be due third form of Inflation, i.e. Built inflation and neither Demand-pull inflation (increase in demand) nor Cost-push inflation (drop in supply)! In Built-in inflation, people expect higher prices for future from past experience and also supported by price/wage vicious circle.

The very basic point about inflation is, going by the definition, “its rise in the price levels of goods and services in an economy”. Considering the definition, let’s look at the causes of the inflation in Indian case.

First, inflation can be due to erosion in the buying power of the trading medium, i.e. country’s currency. The best example is recent hyperinflation of Zimbabwe where-in, 1 million Zimbabwean Dollar was equal to 1 American Dollar! But Indian rupee, in last two-three years traded against the major currency, i.e. Dollar in a band of Rs. 44 to Rs. 48 per Dollar. So there is not much scope for this argument.

Second, the Cost-push inflation due to sudden drop in the supply side of the economy. In a globalised world, supply side shocks may not lasts too long, particularly not two years and so (as Indian Inflation is in double digits for almost two years). Take recent example of Onion price, due to shortage, prices doubled and even tripled for a month or so, but once the supply resumed, prices cooled off. The same logic applies to Oil prices also whose price spiked due to Middle East crisis and hopes of recovery. If Oil price spike is only because Middle East crisis and not due to recovery, then it’s very difficult to sustain at this level!

Third, Demand-pull inflation due to rise in the demand because of higher expendable income helped by higher income and supported by higher spending by private and government. According to one school of thought, “Demand inflation is constructive to a faster rate of economic growth since along with favorable market conditions, it will stimulate investments and expansions”. They say, higher growth comes with higher inflation and we need to learn to live with that, if we want higher growth.

The Demand-pull inflation along with Built-in inflation is the most feasible reason for the Indian inflation from above mentioned three types of causes. Digging even further tells us that inflation is a part of the broad economical cycle and very structural in nature. So to curb this kind of inflation, there should be combined efforts from RBI (in monetary front), Governments (in reducing fiscal/current a/c deficit by reducing spending), lesser Borrowed inflation (from across the border in terms of imports), people’s mentality and so on. Finally we must remember nothing is decoupled in an open economy!

mint artilce: Why India overheats

Continuing my postings on "Indian economy overheating" articles, today I read an article in mint so thought of sharing with you guys.

Highlights of the article...

There is a structural element in the inflation trend, as higher incomes have raised demand for fruit, meat, vegetables and milk. Some inflation has also been imported, as global oil and commodity prices have shot up thanks to the strong economic recovery in emerging markets and loose monetary policies in most Western economies. But domestic cyclical factors are undoubtedly a big part of the story as well.

High inflation expectations could fuel demands for higher wages as well. Whether these two factors have an effect on final prices depends on the ability of Indian companies to pass on higher costs to consumers.

RBI will have to raise interest rates far more aggressively than it has till now. The government has already announced a fairly ambitious plan to cut the fiscal deficit. Higher interest rates will weigh down on private demand and less red ink in the national budget will keep government demand under control. Both strategies will mean that some economic growth will have to be sacrificed.

Demand management can work only in the short term. Further, it will involve sacrificing some growth. The more sustainable response will have to come from the supply side, through more investments and higher production capacity in farm and factory.

A final point: the Economic Survey released by the finance ministry in February used simple calculations to show that the Indian economy is quite capable of growing at 9% a year. India has an investment rate of around 36% of gross domestic product. India requires four units of capital to produce one extra unit output.

For full article click here.

India needs purchasing power rather than subsidies

Recently Tamil Nadu faced state elections and both the main parties were talking about 1 kilo rice for Rs. 1 and other subsidized food products. I have taken Tamil Nadu's example because of recent elections, otherwise subsidies are abundant everywhere in India.

What I wonder is, governments fix the minimum support price for the food article to support the farmers, buys it from the farmers for the support price and same governments sell them to its citizens in a subsidized prices like of Rs. 1. Its same for the oil and its by-products also. So who is going to take care of the deficit of these transactions and how long is it going to work on just blame-game?

India faced a severe Balance of Payment (BOP) crisis in 1991 due to higher fiscal deficit and some external shocks like oil crisis and wars. At that time India had forex reserve of 1 billion dollars which was sufficient to import for just one week. Since oil and wars were/are not in our control totally, no point to elaborate on those issues. But what Indian central and state governments could have controlled is the deficit problem. Due to socialistic era and combined with populist budgets like above mentioned ones (particularly started in southern and eastern states) caused irreversible deficit to the exchequer. And surprising fact is still we are following the same old route towards a possible BOP crisis even after seeing other countries taking development mantras.

Now, in this LPG (Liberalized, Privatized and Globalized) era, India's much publicized recent problems are PDS (Public Distribution System) and Inflation. Due to subsidies, majority of the PDS quantity is sold in the black market without letting the targeted person to claim it.

To avoid the PDS problem central government has started an ambitious project called Unique Identification Number (also called as Adhar) under the leadership of Mr. Nandan Nilekani. But the fundamental problem of "deficit" remains the same even after UID or Adhar project.

India aspires to overtake the China, over a period of next 25-30 years, but with the kind of policies is it possible? India's debt to GDP is more than 70% where-as China's is about 20%. India's foreign reserve is about 300 billion dollars where-as China's is more than 3 trillion dollars. According to recent IMF data available, China's GDP at PPP (Purchasing Power Parity) per capita is more than 35,000 dollars per year where-as India's is around 3,300, thats almost one tenth of China!

Governments should really think of improving the PPP- instead of subsidies. And PPP can be improved only if everybody gets regular jobs to contribute towards the GDP. Again jobs require education, different skill sets and more, which in turn can generate jobs. Governments should think about taking up projects like converting Narrow Gauge to Meter to Broad and single line to double to four line railway tracks, not just increase the trains. Why I am mentioning railway project is because projects like National Highway (by Vajpayee government) and railway track doubling are through out India and can generate lot of employment and at the same time can improve the infrastructure of the country.

Today's Mint Column On Similar Note of My Last Post About Indian Economy Overheating

A losing bout with inflation

With high-inflation expectations and an unceasing march of prices, India is close to a wage-price spiral

Since the new year began, the Indian stock market has fallen 8% below its December peak of 20,509 points. Long bond yields have risen by more than 20 basis points, touching 8.2%. Foreign investors have reduced their weights on Indian investments and capital inflows have turned into a trickle.

Effectively, India stands derated. The persistence of inflation is triggering the rethink. As the feeling that policymakers have no control over inflation gathers force, their macroeconomic stewardship is under question: It didn’t help when the government indicated that usual regulatory measures were ineffective in containing inflation, expressing its helplessness. For these reasons alone, the central bank has to now raise its hand and say “I can”.

There are other reasons, too, for further monetary action. While 36% (3.1 percentage points) of the 8.4% year-on-year rise in the Wholesale Price Index (WPI) in December resulted from food prices, manufacturing inflation accounted for 34% (2.9 percentage points). The persistence in food price inflation, however—a 13.5% increase over December 2009—is now prompting doubters to suspect that strong demand factors could be at play: The prices of vegetables, fruits and other food items are flexible and what if rapid economic growth is also pushing up prices? After all, this year has been nowhere like 2009 when the worst drought in three decades caused temporary supply disruptions. Price spikes due to some vegetable crops harmed by excessive rainfall—which is the case in the last two months of 2010—are temporary and should not be reflected in higher prices of other food items.

Ahead, accelerating commodity prices abroad are a serious risk to core inflation. Some domestic prices—auto and consumer durables— have already risen, following higher input prices; other final prices are likely to follow as margin pressures build up. There’s little spare capacity as utilization levels reached 98% in October, according to a National Council of Applied Economic Research survey. The momentum in bank credit growth indicates strengthening economic activity; the annualized, three-month moving average (deseasonalized) almost doubled to 30.9% between October and December 2010 while year-on-year growth averaged 23% in the same period. Though deposit rates have picked up—deposits grew at 19% year-on-year in December—savers are still getting little returns in real terms. The money multiplier shrank further to 4.8%. The action, therefore, remains in gold and real estate: Bloomberg reported recently that gold imports into India rose to a record high in 2010 and property prices escalated beyond pre-2007 levels in some places.

Public spending continues to be expansionary and it’s unrealistic to expect cuts, given the pattern this year. Even though the fiscal deficit target will be met this year, the inflated nominal gross domestic product (GDP) and tax revenue targets do not fool anybody, nor do the contributions made by one-time, non-tax revenues. The pity is that some of this could have been diverted towards productive investments in agriculture to signal strong determination to tackle food prices; just a beginning— however small—to address the infrastructure deficit and market imperfections in the farm-to-fork supply chain. Such action would be far more credible and effective in quelling inflation expectations instead of periodic assertions that prices will cool in a couple of months. What we have instead is further stimulation through a 17-30% wage hike through indexation of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme wages to the Consumer Price Index for agricultural labourers.

Unsurprisingly, inflation expectations look set to be entrenched at higher levels, only a step short of triggering a price-wage spiral. The central bank’s own survey for July-September 2010 showed household inflation expectations to rise further—from the current perceived 12.1%—to 12.3% in the next one quarter (Oct-Dec 2010) and to 12.7% one year ahead. Though the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) raised interest rates five times, and cash reserve requirements twice in 2010, nominal GDP grew at 19.5% and 18% in the first two quarters of 2010-11, rendering the policy rate at 6.25%—too low a floor. And real interest rates—the difference between the 10-year bond yield and WPI inflation—again turned negative in December.

It is no surprise that RBI has already signalled an increase in interest rates, asserting its determination to restrain inflation. The rise—largely expected to be 25 basis points—will be accompanied by an upward revision to the central bank’s end-year forecast of 6.0% (6.5 or 7.0%?). Recent comments by RBI governor D. Subbarao that the central bank is desperate to control inflation make one doubt that the hike may be even 50 basis points though the declining momentum in industrial production may offset this. Even so, the average 8.9% GDP growth in the first half of 2010-11 may prompt RBI to revise its growth projections as well.

Later, RBI will also have to take the blame for slowing growth. But then, central banks are always the whipping boys for others.

Is Indian Economy Overheating?

Many people might be wondering why I am talking about overheating of an economy in the midst of recovery from present financial crisis. Particularly many people may not agree with the Indian Economy overheating concept that too when November IIP numbers are below 3% (2.7% to be exact), Stock market corrected almost 10% in last two months compared to its peers which gained 5%-10% at the same time and etc...

But if you see the inflation number what India is facing from last two years is above RBI's comfort zone of 5% to 6%. For the year 2009 Indian Consumer Price Index was of 8.3% averaged and where as 2010 CPI was 10.9%. Where as from 2003 to 2008 Indian consumer price index moved between 3% to 6% on average basis. So in these last two years Indian inflation went up by 4% points in the consumer price index level. In this inflation CPI or WPI, food inflation has been major contributor towards the both indexes.

Many analysts say Inflation is the problem of supply side constraint not demand side. And their point is supply side constraint is because of the structural issues we have in India (apart from abnormal rain inside India and outside of India). But what my point is "all these structural issues were in India from last 50 odd years or so, but we never faced such a consistently long inflation particularly on food side!". Now I feel we as a country might be growing much faster than we ourselves can't handle the growth!

I feel India is facing wage inflation, it is condition where in higher wages or increased wages chase little goods available in the market and causing increase in the prices of the goods and in turn putting pressure on wages to hike. Its like a spiraling or vicious circle. Here I would like to mention just one example of this wage inflation putting pressure on food or overall inflation. When I was posting about Decoupling theory, I mentioned about National Rural Employment Guaranty Scheme (NREGS), which government announced in 2005 and implemented fully in the midst of financial crisis. Under this scheme rural households are guaranteed for 100 days work in a year with the minimum 100 rupees wage per day. This has been the biggest contributor to the rural income and expendable amount in rural hand considering more than half of the Indian population is in rural areas. And most of the NRGS' works are related to infrastructure works, which is causing a real shortage of people in the agricultural fields, which in turn causing increase in the wages of the people who are ready to come for agricultural related.

So all this is leading to more spending from rural India, causing increase in the overall demand side also! Otherwise all these years whole India was divided into two parts like Demanding-Urban and Supplying-Rural. First part, that is urban (demanding side) is same or we can say it increased more, but more importantly rural (supply side) is also facing a demand pressure making it (inflation) look like a supply side constraint! That does not mean that we don't have supply side constraint, we do have supply side constraints, structural issues to reform for longer term solution and etc.

But are we ready to face the current situation and upcoming situations???

Decoupling theory depends on structural issues

Whenever world is in economical crisis or in boom period, a school thought start talking about decoupling of certain regions or countries from rest of the world saying that particular region is well protected due to certain reasons.

Many times in my previous postings I talked about the cent percent decoupling in present globalized is not possible. But to a certain extent a region or a country can be decoupled from the rest of the world only on its own structural issues.

Starting from present financial crisis we can take lot of examples where certain parts of the world are in crisis and other parts are not or not affectedly as badly as those. Now so called developed countries like US, UK, Japan, and majority part of Euro Zone are in the threat of double dip recession of deflation, where as BRIC (Brazil, Russia, China & India) countries, Australia and certain African countries are facing threat of Inflation or we can say they are reaching their previous growth trajectory.

India is on the high growth trajectory due to structural issues like domestic savings' pattern (which is of 33% to 35% compared with 2% of US), consumption oriented economy (60% of total country's GDP consumed within India), demographics (55% to 60% of the population is under the age of 26 years), cost effective nature of the companies (which applies to China also), fiscal schemes like NREGS adopted by central government during the slowdown (rather than just monetary policies or so called quantitative easing which have limitation of after certain level like liquidity trap or leakage of money supply due to Interst Rate Parity). Now talking about Inflation which presently is the biggest threat to India's real GDP growth, again due to structural issues like: sudden increase in expendable income of rural household due to NREGS scheme, non-efficiency of public distribution system (PDS) along with supply side problem due to uneven rainfall in certain parts of the country and as usual growth comes with some inflation. According to yesterday's mint, IMF advised India to keep on hiking the interest to cool the inflation, an example of decoupling compared with problem facing countries'.

Now coming to China, the second fastest growing economy, as everybody knows its an export oriented country, but if it is only dependent on export oriented then it should have been in the same position that of US. But its not, in fact it is clicking double digit growth, due to:
1. Massive stimulus package of 4 trillion Yuan, they got from Chinese government of which they spent more than 80 percent, (i.e. more than 3 trillion Yuan on overall infrastructure, which is stepping stone for a country)
2. More than 9 trillion Yuan (more than double of government stimulus) loan disbursement of Chinese banks towards their countrymen lead to massive spending from Chinese towards their internal consumption.
3. Solid current account surplus of whopping $2.6 trillion due to continuous intervention in the forex market to keep Yuan undervalued to help the exporters.

And from inflation point of view, China is also facing similar kind of situation as that of India. Chinese real interest are deep in red due to as low as almost 2% deposit rate and about 5% inflation, which is again divergence from US, UK and Japan.

So similar respective things helped different countries domestically keep the growth momentum

--- Will be continued...

Highlights of Year 2010 and Decade...

First, I wish all my friends and readers a very happy new year 2011.
Second, I decided to take serious resolution first-time in life for new year as to read more and write more personally and professionally!
Now coming to today's topic, year 2010 has been very interesting for markets due to various reasons and witnessed a lot. From these, I have collected 10 important information from www.moneycontrol.com and www.economictimes.com, so thought of sharing with you guys...

1. The Sensex and Nifty rallied 17% each this year while the midcap index is up 16%.
2. The commodities markets have also seen a significant upside with crude being up 13%.
3. Gold has seen appreciation of 28% this year.
4. Silver has been best asset class in 2010 in comparison with all others as it gained 81%.
5. The total investor wealth, measured in terms of cumulative market capitalisation of all listed companies, rose to Rs 72,96,725.14 crore, from Rs 60,79,000 crore at the end of 2009. During the period, the Sensex rose from 17,464.81 points on December 31, 2009 to 20,509.09 points today.
6. As end 2010 is also end of the decade, lets look at the performance Indian markets in this decade. On January 1, 2001, the total market capitalization of the Bombay Stock Exchange was about Rs. 700,000 crore, that is USD 150 billion. Currently, the total market capitalization of BSE is about Rs. 70,70,000 crore, that is USD 1570 billion. This means, the BSE has added about Rs 63,70,000 crore of additional market cap over the past decade, indicating a 9 times increase in market cap over the past decade.
7. At the beginning of the decade, the Sensex was at 3972. Currently, it is trading at 20,527, a 416% rise over the past decade. In other words, if somebody had invested Rs 100,000 in the Sensex at the beginning of the decade, it would have currently become Rs 516,792.
   
8. Now coming to2010 again, this year FII inflows have been the highest ever in India's history at USD 28.6 billion in nine and a half months. In 2009, FIIs invested USD 17.6 billion while the year before in 2008, India registered foreign investors inflows of USD 12.7 billion. One-third of the total FII inflows this year went into the primary market.
9. MF outflows for the year stood at USD 6 billion, also the highest ever in history. A year ago, outflows stood at USD 1.17 billion. Domestic insurance inflows however have seen a steady decline over the last two years. For the year, they came in at a moderate USD 1.5 billion, as against the USD 7 billion registered in 2009 and USD 13.6 billion in 2008.
10. Domestic insurance inflows however have seen a steady decline over the last two years. For the year, they came in at a moderate USD 1.5 billion, as against the USD 7 billion registered in 2009 and USD 13.6 billion in 2008.

Apart from index based news I have taken some stock specific news and global index movements, of which I am posting top 10 companies' stocks (Mid caps and Small Caps only) details below...

Top 10 Mid-cap gainers...

Top 10 Mid-cap losers...

Top 10 Small-cap Gainers...

Top 10 BIG-SURPRISE GAINERS...

Global Index Performances(over three crisis years)...