Rexit

Yesterday, June 18, 2016, Raghuram Rajan in an email address to his staff in RBI communicated that he is not going to seek an extension to his term as a RBI governor, which is ending on September 4, 2016 and will be going back to academia. The timing of his decision is debatable considering the upcoming Brexit voting but his decision may not be debatable considering recent mud-slinging on him.

Three years ago when then Prime Minister Manmohan Singh appointed Raghuram Rajan as RBI governor, I wrote about Rajan's challenges of dealing with Impossible Trinity. When he was appointed in 2013, India was facing problems of decade low growth rate, tumbling domestic currency and double digit consumer inflation.

A quick glance at Rajan's term shows us that he quite successfully dealt with all major problems through monetary policy framework. Immediately after taking the charge he helped the domestic banks to tap large chunk of legitimate foreign funds as deposits in India, which minimized the pressure on Rupee and reduced the volatility on a greater extent.

Under his leadership, RBI changed the inflation watch from old fashioned WPI index to more relevant CPI index and built consensus along with the government of getting a mandate of CPI inflation target 5% by March 2017. During three years of his tenure as RBI governor, he quite successfully brought down CPI inflation from about 11% to 5.7% and now on track to achieve the target. After being inflation warrior during his initial tenure, he adopted to monetary accommodative stance in latter part as he achieved the inflation controlling task.

In addition to monetary policy regulation, he managed to intervene before non performing assets of banking sector spread further and burst. Also, Rajan brought in more competition in banking sector by giving new licenses.

Now the big question for Narendra Modi and his government is who is going to fill the big void created due to Rajan's exit (Rexit). How the government will manage to change the perception of manner in which Rexit happened?

Raghuram Rajan’s first step towards “Walk the talk”

Reserve bank of India governor Raghuram Rajan surprised financial markets on Friday in his first monetary policy review by increasing repo rate. Repo rate is interest rate at which RBI lends to banks.

Financial markets took knock as they weren't prepared for rate hike since economy is growing at slowest pace in recent time, manufacturing/industrial production is almost at standstill and some parts of interest rates were already jacked up to defend the Rupee.

But defying expectations, he decided to,

1) Increase repo rate by 25 basis points from 7.25% to 7.5%

2) Reduce the marginal standing facility (MSF) rate by 75 basis points from 10.25% to 9.5%

3) Reduce the minimum daily maintenance of the cash reserve ratio (CRR) from 99% of the requirement to 95%

On his first day as the Governor of Reserve Bank of India Raghuram Rajan said, “The Governorship of the Central Bank is not meant to win one votes or Facebook “likes”. But I hope to do the right thing, no matter what the criticism, even while looking to learn from the criticism. Some of the actions I take will not be popular.” Guess he was giving signal to markets that he is not here to please, but do the right thing!

By taking these steps he

1) Set his priority of “anchoring inflation and inflation expectations”. He thinks in the absence of an appropriate policy response, WPI inflation will be higher than initially projected and CPI inflation is worrisome. He wants to be ahead of the curve to achieve his target instead chasing it after it goes beyond control. But that doesn't mean he will sacrifice growth to have disinflationary pressure. He believes low and stable inflation in turn boost savings and investor confidence in the economy. He said in concluding remark, “the Reserve Bank will closely and continuously monitor the evolving growth-inflation dynamics with a readiness to act pre-emptively, as necessary”. Here we should remember his first day’s “A central bank should never say “Never”!” remark.

2) & 3) Is reversing some of the steps, which RBI had taken to fight the Rupee depreciation and volatility. These will take care of liquidity pressure in the banking system, additional cost of funding and send out the message loud and clear that normalizing monetary policy operation. Going ahead once the reverse repo-repo-MSF corridor come to normalcy (100 basis points difference between each), repo rate will resume the operational policy rate role.

After watching his media address (following policy review) and listening to teleconference with researchers and analysts, one thing he made sure that he is here for change. Same thing he conveyed on the 4^th September, “It involves considerable change, and change is risky. But as India develops, not changing is even riskier.”

Repeatedly he clarified things like Urjit Patel and team working on an inflation model to target instead of either plain WPI or CPI. Unusual but unique, Rajan is trying to do the balancing act between inflation anchoring, easing liquidity measures and bringing back the normal monetary operation procedure.

Now there are pitfalls in his walk. Being election year will finance minister allow him to take his own decisions and if yes how long? Rajan needs to take Chidambaram and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh into confidence. How long will he be able resist the temptation of growth friendly policy than targeting inflation? Will he able to balance between 3 legs of the impossible trinity in worst case? Will he be transparent in communicating policy guidance, without surprising too many times?  

Do policy makers have any other option?

After recent Federal Reserve meeting, when Chairman Ben Bernanke’s commented about tapering of bond buying program, global financial markets have become very volatile. U.S. benchmark 10 year treasury yields touched 2.8% recently from 1.6% in early May. Hot money started flowing out of emerging markets (EM) following some kind of theme like sell EMs and buy U.S.!

As a result of this majority of emerging countries’ stock and bonds sold-off, currencies started depreciating. Being part of globalized world now, India too is going through all these market phases. Apart from global issues, India has its own problems like large current account deficit, corruption and scandals, policy paralysis making it as non-favorable destination for investment at least for now. Indian growth, measured in terms of GDP, slowed to 5% levels from above 9% levels, Industrial Production data is not showing recovery signs, Consumer Inflation still very high and whole price inflation started inching up again; currency depreciated more than 12% in 12 weeks. 

Indian central bank, RBI is under pressure to support the growth, curtail depreciation of Rupee, monitor the capital flows and has to maintain its independence. RBI is exactly in “impossible trinity”.  

Consequently government and RBI took several measures to curb the currency depreciation and capital flight from India, like hiking gold import duty couple of time, banning importing of bullion coins and medallions, asking gold importers to keep 20% of total imported gold for exports and exports-purpose, domestic liquidity tightening, reducing the limit for Overseas Direct Investment (it’s like Indian FDI abroad) from 400% of the net worth to 100% and so on.

Many commentators are now criticizing these recent policy moves and intervention in market. It’s not the question of either supporting or opposing them, whether policy makers have any other option which will help them in near term? Of course there should not be any second thought on long term plans to correct the fundamentals; but what about immediate future as Keynes famously said “In the long run we are all dead”. 

This brings back the old question, whether markets are efficient or in other terms does efficient market hypothesis holds true? Going by Keynesian concepts and economic boom and bust cycles it does appear like markets need an invisible-hand to guide them and calm the nerves. But that again depends on how big that invisible-hand is, how far it is non-conventional in its approach and how much market is ready to listen to it and trust. Only time will tell!