Do policy makers have any other option?

After recent Federal Reserve meeting, when Chairman Ben Bernanke’s commented about tapering of bond buying program, global financial markets have become very volatile. U.S. benchmark 10 year treasury yields touched 2.8% recently from 1.6% in early May. Hot money started flowing out of emerging markets (EM) following some kind of theme like sell EMs and buy U.S.!

As a result of this majority of emerging countries’ stock and bonds sold-off, currencies started depreciating. Being part of globalized world now, India too is going through all these market phases. Apart from global issues, India has its own problems like large current account deficit, corruption and scandals, policy paralysis making it as non-favorable destination for investment at least for now. Indian growth, measured in terms of GDP, slowed to 5% levels from above 9% levels, Industrial Production data is not showing recovery signs, Consumer Inflation still very high and whole price inflation started inching up again; currency depreciated more than 12% in 12 weeks. 

Indian central bank, RBI is under pressure to support the growth, curtail depreciation of Rupee, monitor the capital flows and has to maintain its independence. RBI is exactly in “impossible trinity”.  

Consequently government and RBI took several measures to curb the currency depreciation and capital flight from India, like hiking gold import duty couple of time, banning importing of bullion coins and medallions, asking gold importers to keep 20% of total imported gold for exports and exports-purpose, domestic liquidity tightening, reducing the limit for Overseas Direct Investment (it’s like Indian FDI abroad) from 400% of the net worth to 100% and so on.

Many commentators are now criticizing these recent policy moves and intervention in market. It’s not the question of either supporting or opposing them, whether policy makers have any other option which will help them in near term? Of course there should not be any second thought on long term plans to correct the fundamentals; but what about immediate future as Keynes famously said “In the long run we are all dead”. 

This brings back the old question, whether markets are efficient or in other terms does efficient market hypothesis holds true? Going by Keynesian concepts and economic boom and bust cycles it does appear like markets need an invisible-hand to guide them and calm the nerves. But that again depends on how big that invisible-hand is, how far it is non-conventional in its approach and how much market is ready to listen to it and trust. Only time will tell!